How Much Is A Porcelain Vase Worth

old dogs: MILEAGE AND EXPERIENCE


How to measure something apparently so capricious and subjective as the experience you have riding a bike? How-To a good idea of \u200b\u200bhow much driving Fulano, Zutano and Richard Roe? After all, most people always think they are better drivers (car or motorcycle) than it actually is. Without giving much back on the subject and subjectivity within that involves estimating the experience of a motorcyclist, we can talk MILEAGE ... and experience associated.

was assumed that two friends with zero experience with bikes decide to take driving lessons and learning together successfully following a similar learning curve. After getting bike license and buy every one is riding a bike, sometimes on walks together, sometimes every one who by his side. After year roll and experience meet one day and take a chilly Malta (uh, just one!) and begin exchanging anecdotes refreshing sunny and rainy days on two wheels. One has over 7000 km, the other has spent tires 12000km. What they believe to be the best rider?

While it would have to do what is best about what (urban shooting, in ballast cross country competition, closed-circuit experience rain, fog and adverse conditions, use alone or with passenger, etc.), as a rule, the higher the mileage, the more experience. The more miles we take up more likely to have faced all the variables mentioned above (and others) and eventually, the practice and study we will strengthen our skills behind the crank.

Many of my students are surprised when we talk about these things and begin to realize that motorcyclists much more serious and committed not stop to count every mile traveled and always looking for ways to refine technique and mastery more and more. mileage, rather than the years of being a rider, we will say how much we have come and how much we need to go in the endless process of becoming ever better drivers on two wheels. At the end of 100000 km facts are worth more in 3 years down the road than 50000 in 10 years or more.

In fact, not a bad idea to take a small log book "flight" where, although we will not put "dear diary noting ...", go more or less detailed data as a average daily, weekly, monthly and annual miles traveled, the trips made, the distance between a city / province to another, the average travel time between such a place, etc. As time passes and increasing our "fang" it becomes possible to look back and compare its level of 1000 km and we have now to the 15000 or 50000 km of experience.

Personally, citing data from my experience so far I can tell you:

* After 300 km I had my first fall from a train line wet
* My first part in Turrialba and to rob the 3000 km the helmet for a while
* At 10000 km I crash with a friend to get out of a curve (inappropriate braking)
* 18000 km and drilled oil tank of the motorcycle after losing control on wet roads
* 23000 km and three types I chased a pickup truck while bike debut (almost does not count!)
* 55000 km before licensed A4 (501 cc and above)
* 62000 km approx. when I started teaching bike handling
* 68000km and two teachers on a motorcycle followed us to me and a friend (until we change their minds)
* 90 000 + km, 112 motorcycle licenses won, several students in preparation licenses for A3 and A4 of bike!
* Travel between 13 000 and 15000 km per year, but now classes the number of miles each time is increasing.


As I hope you have been thinking with reading, rookie to step old dog, chicken motorcycle rider experienced, crafty and fanged not happen overnight. is a long process that does not stop and continues to bring both scares and one or two bad time as almost unlimited freedom and thousands of joys. then I urge you to count the miles, to record their experiences on the bike, to study and learn in this blog and elsewhere motorcycle and still enjoy the two-wheelers in the safest manner possible. See you on the road!



R.




@ Interested in getting a license? Tips for choosing your first bike? How to be taking the first steps? The blog is much more than what you see on the first page, so l @ s invite you to see the other pages on "Post Older" at the bottom of each page pure and to follow the blog. You can contact me at 8814-9694.

Can Women Who Have Menorrhagia Conceive

AMLO "ibid?

Denise Dresser article published today in Reforma. I hope the cavemen and ultras of the pseudo left to read.


AMLO "ibid? Denise Dresser


"I'll be back" threatens Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator. "I will again presidential candidate, Andrés Manuel López Obrador announced in recent days. And is good news because it should not be AMLO in 2012, or at least as it was in 2006. Hopelessly combative, confrontational, anti-institutional. Invariably atavistic, stubborn, conservative, stubborn. Someone whose positions are unclear, and often contradictory, have inspired a confidence that will be difficult if not impossible, to trace. Someone who got left in an alley which is finding it very difficult to leave, despite the successful electoral alliances of recent times.

For those who think-think-that Mexico should have a functional left, few things look as sad as the tragedy of self-sabotage for four years. The injury has been inflicted on itself since the last presidential election. The paper left suicide divided is determined to play. The PRD and the PT and Convergencia caught in a logic of constant confrontation with each other and without knowing exactly what to do with Andrés Manuel López Obrador. The PRD engine become your worst enemy. López Obrador become an advocate involuntary return of the PRI. AMLO responsible, not even weigh it, a regression that has contributed.

Makin 'wrong decisions, over and over again, that weaken his political position and strengthen the contrary, by making statements that detract from the transfer support and who wants to weaken but ends up shoring, denying the legitimacy of the PAN-PRD alliance but have become the only way to stop the PRI. AMLO as a driver counterproductive and self-destructive actor, a politician who heads a left paradoxical bent on empowering the PRI right. A left lopezobradorista that instead of acting as effective counterweight to the PRI revived, explains its progress.

This product of the post-election decision in 2006 that AMLO took, and therefore it is imperative to remember. It made no sense to require the recount and, at the same time, refusing to accept the results. It made no sense to denounce the illegality of the war and, at the same time, accept the advances of PRD in it. There was no point asking for a review of the election votes and, at the same time, suggesting a need to cancel. It was a good strategy to discredit the entire game and insist that he won. It was a good strategy to order the recount and also suggest that not respected. Not a good idea to hell with the institutions and thus alienating those who refused to believe that AMLO was dangerous and now think it is.

And if Lopez Obrador does not understand this, I hope that other members of the Mexican left themselves are able to do so. Hopefully realize that the project of nation that is proposed is too narrow, too exclusive, too monochromatic. Who wants to rule the country where there is only room for the poor. The candidate who has never said what it will do for the middle class and how to encourage their expansion. The redeeming features to alleviate poverty but does not explain how to create wealth. The social leader who does not know how to become a professional politician.

Do not understand the need to slide toward the center of the political spectrum and lead a modern and purposeful left from there. Unable to learn than just that brought to power Tony Blair and Felipe González and Ricardo Lagos and Michelle Bachelet. The transformation of historical grievances in the practical proposal. The reinvention of resentment in approach. The fight against inequality combined with measures to ensure mobility. But Lopez Obrador will not or can not think that way. For his obstinacy. For his stubbornness. Not to moderate their positions when it should. By threatening and blackmailing PRD legislators seeking to form a front against the PRI in Congress. Not to adjust its posture and position in the center pragmatic rather than dig into the left recalcitrant. To think that you do not need convincing, you can just exist.

This is a devastating diagnosis for those who believe that Mexico needs a left led by progressive leaders, bold, visionary. A left able to overcome the intransigence that strengthens the PRI instead of halting its advance. A left that it fuels the progressive change and not a pretext for the conservative restoration. A left with viable ideas and not just moral positions. A left who can speak to the middle classes rather than alienating them. A political force who can be viable opposition and government, because the country needs both. And if not, López Obrador can sing the Beatles song I'll be back and say "I'll be back again ... I want you, but we must respond with" Oh no. "